Welcome to the Wikipedia Cleanup section! Please report messy articles below, and explain why it needs to be cleaned-up (ex. grammar, spelling, formatting, order, copyright issues, confusion, etc.). Please be sure to sign your addition by using the following format: --~~~~
Any user can edit and fix any page. Please remove any entry from this page after it is fixed (do not just put a strike through it, or leave it), and remember to take the appropriate tag (or any other tag) off the page, once it is done. Please feel free to use the Wikipedia: Cleanup resources, to post what you think needs to be cleaned-up, or for you to use as a guide.
Anyone who wants to work on cleanup jobs is asked to fix articles at the bottom of the list, because they have been listed for the longest period of time (Older cleanup:Category: Cleanup by month). (the current month, and the past five months only).
PLEASE USE THIS FORMAT: *[[The name of the document]] - Why it needs to be fixed
FOR EXAMPLE:
wikipedia - Copied from a different page, and the spelling is not used in correct grammar or wrong.
When you want to make a new line, for example you want to add a note, you simply add a : in front of the star. If there is already a note, then just add another : in-front of the star, etc.
PLEASE USE THIS FORMAT: :*I cleaned it up a little, but it is still a little messy.
FOR EXAMPLE:
wikipedia - Copied from a different page, and the spelling is really bad.
I cleaned it up a little, but it is still a little messy.
Please be sure to sign your additions by using signature button in the toolbar or by typing the following (two dashes and four tildes): --~~~~
Laura Leighton - Needs general cleanup. Has half a sentence at the end of the first paragraph, questionable article quality, etc. Viper007Bond 12:14, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Started the cleanup - added actor side box, and refnotes. I'm still new to this so will add more once I find out what's allowed and not (pictures, etc). EvokeNZ 03:42, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
72 Virgins - Is virtually entirely unsourced, and has the smell of inaccuracy and bias. I have found a lot of claims about this "72 virgins" story, but no actual facts from reliable sources about who (if anyone) believes it, where it comes from, etc. Elliotreed 17:46, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
April 04, 2007
Capture-bonding - Unorganized paragraphical structure causes confusion while reading. Bobryuu 21:30, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Unverified, rambling additions. Cut down to size. -- Shoejartalk/edits 02:16, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
ZZZap! - Suffers from poorly constructed sentences and dodgy English. Needs some revising for grammar. Content is overly long and covoluted. The As it is, the article is fairly unreadable and massive. I did a little editing, but I'm not really familiar with the show, being American and all.. --Lendorien 22:15, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Route poisoning - Confusing at best - inaccurate at worst. I don't know enough to fix myself, but I know that the author is confusing route poisoning and poison reverse. Someone with expert networking knowledge needs to go over this. 68.85.119.250 22:46, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Fight Fever - This needs wikification, npov, and a rewrite. Metrackle 21:48, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Dragon Master - Much like Fight Fever, needs wikification, npov, and a rewrite. Metrackle 21:51, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Ludacris - Not insufferable, but still very much of a mess. Scratch that, it's poorly written and POV-infested. Needs significant revision and formatting to read professionally. --FuriousFreddy 04:46, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Alan Haskvitz - Essay-type article on individual who may be notable, but the external links at the bottom may or may not all be relevant. Someone with time may want to research this person to help judgment. At the least, this needs to be cleaned up to a more encyclopedic format. --Kinut/c 14:40, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Higher education in Portugal - This article has poor grammar usage and needs to be reworded where necessary. It was written by non-native english speakers (including me). Thanks.Page Up 12:41, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
April 01, 2007
Information theory - Introduction is almost an epic writing with many too generalizing text without any real information value (Info. th. (...) is crucial to success of the Voyager missions ... what?) and the very beginning with the weather simile is misleading, if not wrong; entropy is being confused with information, entropy is in fact information rate!
Al Taqwa Bank - need to be a bit more lucid and succinct. Also, something is very wrong with the page if a great deal of spell-checking needs to be done in order to correct it. "General clean-up in several areas, including factual accuracy, citations, clarity and organization." is applicable to this. --Qwerty (talk) 05:47, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
March 2007
March 31, 2007
Azeri - the first picture on the left is misleading and inappropriate.
What picture? And how? -- Shoejartalk/edits 04:20, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Ear piercing instrument The page seems to be a few different sides of an argument bickering, and it shows in the text.
Sidux - Seems to require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. I have made a few changes, please check and correct it. --77.181.131.58 11:49, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
I took a jab at it. A lot of the work simply required naturalization of the English grammer, so that's done. I can't say anything about the informational content itself. Still needs sourcing. --Lendorien 17:26, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Rock the Vote - Much of the article is straight copy-paste, tenses are mixed, and sections need to be added. -- Xenoveritas 15:41, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
March 28, 2007
ASA and Asa - While they have many distinct listings, some points are shared, which really doesn't make any sense. Im.a.lumberjack 19:19, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Nalanda College - This article isn't much more than a list of alumni of the named school, most of whom can't be considered relevant; furthermore there are several formal problems (e.g. excessive use of titles and honorifics). Ananda College could be taken as an example of how to do it right. Krankman 11:35, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
March 27, 2007
Conservatism in Canada - General cleanup in several areas, including factual accuracy, citations, clarity and organization. Hipsterlady 21:47, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Tiësto - Career section begins well but ends up in a mere listing of sometimes irrelevant events. Furthermore, the end of the section looks really messy. --Ionstorm 17:53, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
List of Colombians - It's overloaded with colombian personalities which aren't "important enough" to feature on this list. To much information to describe each person (needs sumary of each description). Information is not well organized and seems traduced badly (directly from spanish), and it has been vandalized before -- Minako-Chan* 21:22, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Dolphins-Jets rivalry - Lots of information (perhaps too much), but unencyclopedic tone throughout much of the article; too much for me to rewrite on my own. Could use some copyediting too, perhaps. -- Highway99 06:30, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Elevorganisasjonen - Very little content and no independent sources. I've tidied it up, but it needs attention from someone who knows the subject. -- DoorsAjar 08:29, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
March 23, 2007
Jean-Pierre Chevènement - Needs improvement in the English from someone who knows more about the subject than I do. I've done some basic work on the phraseology but more is needed. Luke Parks 22:01, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Bob Woolmer - Dates displayed wrong and not linked. Paragraph breaks messy. --DSPoh 13:22, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Cleaned up somewhat, but may need additional changes. --DSPoh 13:33, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Ronson's Lighters - Not much content; loosely organized. I did a bit of copyediting, but this article needs to be revised and expanded. --DoorsAjar 08:41, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Tibullus - Recently wikified, but still contains much unchanged text from the 1911 EB. Also needs updating with more recent information. --Smalljim 12:41, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Attempted clean-up. I attempted to break some of the larger sentances, and changed imprecise wording (its, ect.) to more accurately specify which noun to which it referred. Also broke one of the larger paragraphs. Expert attention and sources still likely needed. Wintermut3 03:47, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
First Disney Channel Games - Grammar is bad, needs to be broken up and have clearer information in tables etc. --Natasha1994 09:03, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Shining Time Station: 'Tis a Gift Much of the information is good, but it will require some work to bring it up to encyclopedic tone and style.--RAult 21:35, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Ribesal - Real topic, but extremely badly written, unreferenced, and unwikified. - Mike Rosoft 22:12, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Wofford College - Seems more like an advertisement than a genuine article describing a college. The alumni section has some obvious advertisements, one especially about a "well-known playboy" which is obviously ridiculous. Don't know if I can just plain edit, so leaving that up to the moderators. Thanks 72.185.204.89 03:47, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
HP-28 series - This article has large quote from another article. I have never tagged an article to be cleaned up before, but this one really needs to be tagged. I don't really know what to do to fix it. 20:33, 21 March 2007 (UTC)24.147.250.96 20:34, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Transcluded quote removed in favor of a wikilink, I also added a 'see also' link to graphing calculator, which contains the section in question. For future reference, it's not out of line to be bold and remove obviously innapropriate material, especially stuff like that, given that it's a likely self-reference issue. Wintermut3 03:54, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
March 19, 2007
Norwin High School is in desperate need of cleanup. Clearly much of the article is fabricated and meant to be a joke. --63.118.137.168 21:23, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Looks like a moderator and few other people have taken all the junk out and made it relevant (added school district and names of administrators) Borisshah
NASD - Decent start, but this article needs some more sources and a NPOV examination --Wootonius 21:21, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Environmental issues in Ethiopia - Good info, but sounds like it's written by a non-native speaker, lots of redundancies and some grammar/spelling errors
Fall of the Roman Empire - Article needs to be organised under headings, subheadings and such - also the article requires a general proofreading. 60.240.7.64 05:14, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Dronfield - This article has been subject to many small, unstructured additions producing an incoherent and somewhat unintelligible read. The information in the main body is delivered in a short and almost truncated manner for the most part, explicating very little as the topics progress. Secondly, half of the text under “History” relates very loosely to history; distinct sections relating explicitly to their own content may solve this. --Naqahdah 14:08, 19 March 2007 (UTC)Naqahdah
Chuck Norris - Article has been vandlized so much, I really just couldn't fix it all alone. I took away the things I knew were not correct (i.e Height= 78 axe handles) to try to clean it up a little bit. It is hard because after fixing it, before I can warn people its being vandalized by a new set of people.Inter16 15:41, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
List of counties in Illinois - Looks like somebody tried to fix the formatting, but now the page just plain doesn't work. I can't even figure out what was trying to be done, but maybe somebody else can see the direction that was being taken? —Fumo7887 (talk • contribs) 21:53, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Looks like someone did try to change the formatting, in turn screwing up the placement of everything after Crawford and before LaSalle. Those County1s are what is left of those counties. Ksabato 01:11, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
March 18, 2007
Yale University - a mess on many levels, I'd call this high priority given the prestige of the institution. Way too many external links, way too long - break out sections into their own articles; not many reverences. For starters. Maybe the "village idiot" wrote this one?
Video camera - article is unclear and needs an editor with some knowledge of the subject to check it.
Olivia_(singer) - Proofreading for typos and general cleanup required, e.g. same facts are stated multiple times in several locations (bio, music career)
Erotic Lactation - Article needs general proofreading. Spelling errors, non-words, and some colloquial speech detracting from encyclopedic tone.
Non statutory female on male rape - This article is wrought with original research, grammar/spelling errors, uncited claims, etc. Every section I begin to rewrite leaves me thinking that the information that needs restating is OR anyway. Any thoughts? -Etafly 17:48, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
If I felt I could see a contentious process through, I'd nominate this for deletion. It's possible a good article could be written on the topic, but it would bear little resemblance to the jumbled mess that is there now. Good catch, and good luck with the cleanup! -Pete 01:57, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Sutton High Sports College - This article needs proofreading, verified sources and generally, a more encyclopedic tone. --EscapingLife 21:48, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
March 17, 2007
Noelle Pikus Pace - This article is poorly written and from a first person perspective. The person is real and seems notable but the text of the article needs much attention. Sadly more than I hace this morning. JBEvans 10:55, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Social studies - This article needs clean-up, streamlining or a complete rewrite and/or a possible merge? I tried some by correcting spelling but I do not have enough time, interest nor experience to format the layout and content. Also not sure about the validity/nobility of the subject, as it seems to be some sort of set of study hints for students; therefore un-encyclopedic? I also tried to make the layout look a bit better, it's better looking but still is a poor article in my opinion. Hopefully someone will look at this to help clean it up, expand it, merge it, or delete it. I did add a stub tag. Dunno :/ -Jeeny 19:01, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
I tried to break up the material in the introduction into subsections as well as removing some redundancy and confusing sentence structure. I also rephrased the Digital Technology section to be easier to understand and to sound less like a commercial. I don't know enough about the teaching methods to know what to do with them, but I recommend perhaps just creating a new page or linking to an existing one that covers the method of teaching. The current lists are not very informative and seem more like a brochure than an encyclopedia entry. SPH. 17, March 2007.
General Hospital - This article is in need of some basic cleanup and reformatting. If left untended, it will essentially turn into a recap/fansite page. I don't have a problem with posting storyline-type information, but it needs to be brought up to WP Quality standards. Also, fans keep adding new couple and supercouple pages for practically every set of characters - most of which is in blatant violation of WP:NOR. I would think most of the "couple" pages are good candidates for deletion. A few, like Luke and Laura Spencer are definitely Notable for their contribution to the modern Soap Opera, but most are frivolous and unnecessary.--66.91.225.99 02:34, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
March 16, 2007
All Saints' Academy - Much of this article has been taken directly from the school's website and is therefore un-encyclopedic. Additionally, students from the school seem to have added irrelevant/nonsensical material and (later deleted) vandalism - see "Latin" section. The article needs to either be cleaned up/streamlined to look like an encyclopedia article or deleted. --207.119.34.65 23:47, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Perhaps the Latin section should be deleted. Undegoing discussion on its talk page. Rjgodoy 21:44, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Rachel Stevens - The article seems to have too many sections, and become very messy and untidy to look at. Blacksilkandy 22:05, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Islam Spread - This article has a few passages with clearly biased points of view and should be written much more neutrally. Examples of quotes include "The infamous Hakim (Al-Hakim bi-amr-Allah, the sixth Egyptian Caliph, 996-1021, who became the god of the Druze) determined to destroy the Holy Sepulchre (In 1010.)" Infamus? God of the Druze? What?
"Yet, in spite of all, Christianity failed, and Islam succeeded in gaining the Iranian race." I think there is a much better way of saying that. --213.174.190.59 17:00, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
March 15, 2007
Morgellons - This article is full of confirmation bias. When I attempted to challenge the logic of those posting a very biased, anti-Morgellons article, I was told I didn't have any knowledge of the disorder by Chairboy. In fact, I have considerable knowledge of the disorder and I am challenging their posting of the research. There is no way to edit this article neutrally as it is not a neutral article. Those who are writing it want it to be against Morgellons, therefore, this entire article should be flagged as so and it should be deleted in its entirety. Chairboy does not have the credential to determine who is presenting valid research and who is not presenting valid research. He also believes that research that has been presented and dissed by some is also not challengeable. Their is no consensus (except the anti-Morgellons view) by any of the writers of this article and it is very, vividly apparent that those who try to put in balancing statements will have their statements deleted. The anti-More will not allow any discussion presenting any cause as credible even if there are thousands of pages of research supporting the discussion. This article is junk scholarship and for that reason alone, this article MUST be deleted by Wikipedia if Wikipedia is to maintain their credibility as a place for neutrality and good scholarship.RamyB777 02:44, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
The organization and presentation of the information gives an unclear picture as to what Morgellons actually is supposed to be, which to say that the article fails to give a cohesive picture of the supposed disorder.
March 14, 2007
Denmark Vesey- Its Still very messy but well written--Winn3317 21:04, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
The penny farthing bicycle - Very messy indeed, needs a better introduction and a few grammatical errors are present. - 80.43.70.214 19:24, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Have removed most of the grammatical errors and improved the introduction somewhat.--Monocle1 13:47, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
[[1]] - Not sure to what extend but information regaurding resons for and against may be wrong, I have corrected reasons why, if anyone care to expand on these thoughts. --168.169.99.240 16:33, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Library - Could probably be divided up into several articles: one section has a request for development. -- Jackiespeel 19:09, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Sri - The article is just totally misformatted and repeats paragraph, spacing is all wrong. The whole thing is royally screwed up.
Cleaned it up some. Still needs work. RichM90071 01:34, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Jared Ingersoll - All the information is there, the page just needs a little formatting work.
May contain copyright violations. The bioal info beyond the intro was added as a text dump by an unregistered user recently. This needs to be checked. -- Lendorien 15:38, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Sunflower_oil - Is nearly an adveement. No NPOV, and no hear-say claims.
Rancho San Joaquin Middle School - Seems a little one-sided, don't you think. It is only talking about one humanities teacher, Kay Gee, there are other humanities teachers and other teachers there who deserve to have their name on their as well, not just her. Please do something about it, I didn't want to touch it, but I might fix it a bit... just a bit.
Shorts - The section 'Motivation' is poorly worded. -- Bitbut 01:46, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
I tried to clean it up a bit and reword it. More than just the Motivation section needs work. --Joanna 03:09, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Juiced 2 - Uses current tense for a non-released game, has poor grammar, and no internal links. As noted at the top of the article, the article also provides insufficient context for those who know nothing of the subjsect matter.
Tense has been corrected along with most of the grammar
Added quite a few internal links RichM90071 02:15, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Popular music - Many weasel words, many statements needing citations, general cleanup needed, check for grammatical consistency needed.
Koragg the Knight Wolf - The spelling of "Leanbow" needs to be corrected to "Alianbow". I tried to correct this, but in vain had all of the changes reverted back to the preset settings. If speaking to me is necessary, then my talk page is Ralph Magic.
Gaffney High School - A user has put a large amount of unformatted text in the article, and asked me not to revert it. Could somebody make heads or tails of it? - Mike Rosoft 18:26, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
The broken formatting has been fixed, but I still think there's too much (not particularly encyclopedic) content. - Mike Rosoft 14:08, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
I'll Sue Ya - For one thing, people keep editing it with incorrect lyrics (the lyrics can be found here, it's an unofficial site, but it's reputable, and it's the fourth link on the official site's links page). Also, it has been made clear that the video for the song is not recent, but some editors just don't get it. The video was released with the album, on the DVD side which had animated videos for all the original songs, but it was only recently added to his MySpace page. In general, the article seems to be sloppy since so few editors are paying attention. I was trying to help maintain it, but I'm starting lose my patience with it. If it gets nominated for deletion, I'll probably support the nomination if it can't be cleaned up soon. - Ugliness Man 04:34, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
March 09, 2007
Fettes College - The reference to this Scottish school is now not worthy of Wikipedia as it is not objectivce and it is fairely obviious someone is taking advantage of Wikipedia's openess and writing about events which probably occur in most educationaL establishments ( scandal) and which do not add very much to WIKIPEDIA over the passage of time. Therefore I have deleted large sectiions and will delete the same should they appear. - —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wikipedia User:Noremacnomis (talk • contribs).
Please note that this editor has been warned for vandalism due to repeatedly removing content from this page Lurkeroi! 16:38, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Varalaru - History of Godfather - Many grammatical and clarity errors. Much of the content essential to a good article on a film is there, but it is also confusing to read. Most of the spelling errors have been addressed, but the original author(s) may not be familiar enough with English (no criticism intended). A good copy editor is essential, and familiarity with the film may be beneficial. The article will benefit from much paring of excessive detail, and significant citing. Also, many, many incidences of what appears to be original research, or at least, personal interpretation. :— Jim Dunning talk : 03:30, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
March 08, 2007
Cars Diecast Line - Confusion as to what material should be included or not. Organization could be lots better also. Lots of new information being added seems outside the scope of the article, and I'm beginning to doubt whether it was worth keeping when it was nominated for deletion. --Rick Beckman 22:43, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Rodney Mullen - Massive spelling and grammatical errors, in addition to many unsourced statements and statements that may not even be true, such as "he inspired all the little kids to begin skateboarding. I believe that it had been vandalized recently, and many of the errors may be due to the vandalism. As I don't think anything said in this article is accurate, I suggest it be cleaned up or rewritten.
March 07, 2007
Country pop - No sources, informal and awkward style (incl. unnecessarily long, if not run-on, sentences), poor grammar.
Cleanup and confusion tags added. TenPoundHammer 22:51, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Hollow moon - This article is a complete mess, written by a single unexperienced editor with obvious bias. Personally I think the subject could be notable enough to merit it's own article, there are books out there about the "theory", but the format should be in line with articles like Hollow earth, the faked moonlanding hoax and David Icke's crackpot theories. Zainker 10:34, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
M/V Islander - This article is very short, with several errors in capitalization, spelling and grammar.
M/V Nantucket - This article is similar in quality to the previous.
Privatization - Most of this article suffers from a total lack of sources. Furthermore, it has relatively little information on its actual subject; actual facts about privatization are overwhelmed by information about arguments pro and con. Even discussions of actual privatizations tend to overemphasize information about the arguments surrounding it relative to other facts, which is a serious information bias. Elliotreed 19:35, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
March 06, 2007
Calvary - "References in popular culture" section makes up over half the article and contains a lot of non-encyclopedic content.
British African-Caribbean community - Is supposed to be about the African and Caribbean communities in Britain but instead is completely about the Caribbean, please clean it up. I already tried but somebody changed it back.
American Pie - Has words run together, misspellings of McLean's name, and far too many other errors and REALLY needs a good cleanup by someone with good grammar.
Praieira revolt - This article needs cleanup. Needs more context and details. It's badly in need of sourcing and a general reorginaziation of the info. It reads like a philisophical essay rather than an article and is light on any real meat. --Lendorien 00:57, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Cleaned up grammer a little, but I didn't want to touch it much because I know nothing on the subject. --postofficebox
Precompiled header - Needs a grammar check, I would clean it up now, but it's a bit early in the morning for me. --Roguelazer 09:03, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
I cleaned up the grammar, but the page still needs a C++ expert's attention. -- ObtuseAngle 15:52, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Grammar corrections concerning some topics I know, but the page still needs C++ experts' revision. -- Rjgodoy 13:27, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
March 04, 2007
Mario Chanes de Armas - Was originally posted by a known anti-Castro agitator and frequent defamer of current Cuban regime - I keep having to change back "dictator" to "president" - also poorly composed and uses very one-sided source-material
Animal cell article: needs more info, I was looking up information for my science test tomorrow and there was only the definitions of the three main parts of the cell.
Much more information can be found at human cells. --Andries 19:28, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Ranger's Apprentice - Requires checking of detail, an info bar, a table of contents, locations, cleanup of messy character section, and better summary of the books.
Biotechnology - Needs a cleanup of the formatting and on the info. It is currently too messy and hard to retrieve information from...
Jarboe - Has too few references to other pages and discography needs a major cleanup, in compliance to the standard way of mentioning a huge list of albums.
Europa-Park - Added the Infobox, but will not format properly. Can somebody take a look and help out? Also the article is in need of some general reformatting to make it easier to read. Poeloq 21:56, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Paleo-Paganism - One-sided information on a concept that seems redundant and invented by a single author and lacking academic consensus. The originator of the article resists any editing or labelling, as shown in the Talk page. See also Meso-Paganism. -- jofframes 22:52, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
was meant to be on this project page, apparently wasn't added; so, I've updated the tag, and yes, it is in dire need of cleaning-up, what with all this POV statements, untruths, and whatnot being edited into the article. --Qwerty (talk) 14:32, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
SS Standartenfuhrer Guenther Anhalt - Major revision! Wikified, checked accuracy, did some research. Need an expert: was this guy involved in the Wormhoudt massacre? He became a company commander in the involved battalion 18 days before the massacre. Fifth Rider 22:25, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Castellabate - appears to be a Google translation from Italian --AW 17:25, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Ross-on-Wye - Just needs a little polish, after the merge with Plague Cross left some doubled information. The formatting is also a bit off and the article needs expanding. Finally, the links appear to include an advert for GB Sports.--Jddriessen 23:21, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
March 01, 2007
Backcombing - Some length would be nice, maybe more detail too. -- Ricefountian 23:05, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Ankur Group - Needs Wikifying from what looks like computer-magazine-ese. -- Jackiespeel 15:29, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
February 2007
February 28, 2007
Pierre Trudeau - This article has a whole number of problems. Firstly none of the words make any sense - all mispelled (possibly vandalism)It is also lined with the text OUR FIGUREHEAD IS NOT WHAT SHE SEESM!!!!!!(UTC)
The Bad Girls Club - Copyediting needed to fix grammatical and syntax errors. Overall organization needed. 24.22.210.14 19:10, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Jauhar - This article seems to have been patched together from other Wikipedia material and original work from a non-native English speaker. Even if the grammatical errors were fixed, this article could still probably stand to be completely rewritten, referenced, and generally wikified. - Lukeonia1 09:10, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Fictional technology - This has a bit of editorializing about 19th c. England and 20th c. USA being "dominated by a military-industrial complex." The speculations about why specific technologies may not be appropriate technology are interesting but could stand to be reworded. --Kris Schnee 11:45, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Afzalsho Shodiev - Says that he is a "popular Tajik singer" - more information needed. - Mike Rosoft 12:34, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Mars Hill Church - Read a little too informally and a little too much like an ad. Already did some cleanup, but could possibly use more. - raekwon 14:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
I did a lot of copyediting and rewording for clarity, and removed some redundant text. However, this still needs a look from someone familiar with the topic. --DoorsAjar 00:42, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Nautical tourism - Worthy topic, but needs a rewrite/expansion; unreferenced, not written in an encyclopedic style. - Mike Rosoft 11:14, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Tony Hutchinson - Bad grammar and lots of broken links. Samx 20:08, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Lexical knowledge - Currently orphaned, cites no references, and in need of encyclopedic style. WillHarper 00:14, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
February 26, 2007
MonoDevelop - The article's text seems to be lifted directly off the MonoDevelop website. Someone who is familiar with the software should probably clean it up. (I left a message on the talk page weeks ago, but no one noticed. I'm not using MonoDevelop so I really don't know anything about it.)Ubuntu Dude 00:47, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Roman Catholic Diocese of Bergamo - Copying this from another article description below: "Numerous style, spelling and grammar issues; would benefit from a complete rewrite." Difficult to extract meaning from the many sentence fragments. This probably requires someone familiar with the subject in order to understand what's going on. -Cue the Strings 17:19, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Libertà condizionata - Same as above. Both articles were created by the same user, and are plagued with basic structural problems. Appears to be talking about the parole system in Italy - someone with knowledge of that would have an easier time cleaning this up. -Cue the Strings 17:23, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
February 24, 2007
Zodiac Killer - The article is well written, but far too long and out of most reader's attention spans. It could also use more citations for its sources. -Ultima Designs 01:30, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Sexy prime - very confusing, as there are several "as of" statements referring to different dates, yet all are written in the present tense. - Im.a.lumberjack 21:59, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Armenian Genocide - The references in this article are a mess. I could really use some help fixing them. AecisBrievenbus 23:00, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
