|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Shape
Three inflection pointsThe female body has three key physical points of inflection:
The female body always inflects inward towards the waist at the mid-to-lower stomach. It is smaller than the other two, unless the stomach has stored fat. How much the chest or hips inflect inward, towards the waist -- or in the opposite direction -- from the waist outward towards the chest or hips, results in how women are shaped structurally. A woman's "dimensions" are often presented by the circumference around these three inflection points. For example, a common ideal is "36-24-36" in Imperial units (as in the pop song "Brick House"), meaning a 36" chest, 24" waist and 36" hips. However, a more exaggerated ideal (as in the AC/DC song "Whole Lotta Rosie") 42-39-56.
These underlying inflection points often do define the limits or expanse of those attributes, especially with width and/or weight gain. Four combinatorial structuresIndependent of fat percentage, weight or width, most female bodies have one of four elementary geometries, ordered by their commonality in western society.
A recent British study of over 6,000 women found that over 46% were Rectangle, over 20% Pear, under 14% Apple, and under 9% Hourglass (source: The End of the Hourglass Figure). These numbers may not be typical of other regions in the world, but seem to reflect well female shapes in western society. New research suggests that hourglass women may live longest, and apple-shaped the shortest (source: Curvier women 'will live longer'). Proportion and widthThe inflection points on the female form define a woman's combinational structure. But that structure itself can have larger or smaller proportions. Perfectly healthy women of larger proportions can have chest/hips dimensions over 40" with waists greater than 30", while smaller porportional women can have health issues with waists as little as 25". The proportion of a woman (regardless of weight) tends to be her first, immediately recognizable attribute noticed when she is clothed (hiding any fat distribution). Correspondingly, typical clothing sizing only represents these proportions as a whole, and not the inflections and combinational structures. Thus when choosing clothing, women should try it on to know how it fits their body shape. In common American dress sizing:
When a woman grows wider (with increased dimension points) but not taller, there can be two reasons. First, women often gain width (especially at the hips) in their base structure after having their first child, which is impossible to reverse. Second, it may be due to increased fat storage. A woman who gains width is more likely to be more slender and shapely than a woman of equivalent height and weight. Weight and fat distributionThe last and most greatly debated attribute is actual weight. Despite common belief to the contrary, weight is not always a good indicator of whether someone is fat, because it completely ignores proportion as well as the inflectional dimensions. A woman of greater proportions weighs more than one of smaller ones, even if she is equally fit. Likewise, if the form of a woman is wider (from the front) for her height than average, she is more slender (from the side) and has less protrusion than a woman of equal weight. This is one reason why Body Mass Index (BMI) is currently considered a poor metric for calculating whether a woman is overweight or not. Newer research is beginning to back this up[citation needed]. A new metric that is working well is the protrusion of the stomach (visible from the side) (need to cite the scientific name for this metric). The more protrusion, the greater the health risk. Excess fat is deposited on the stomach. This is the basis for the hip-to-waist ratio as well. Hip-to-waist is calculated by dividing your waist measurement by your hip measurement. The ideal ratio for women is about 0.7 (need to cite). The structure of a woman greatly defines where the body will distribute fat. There are many tendencies that result based on the four body types -- almost a direct result of the magntitude of their body's varying inflections.
Other descriptionsIn addition to those commonly associated with a range of dress sizes, there are a few other, common descriptions and terms used to describe women.
Societal impactMany societies vary on their contrasts, criticisms and praise of the female form. FertilitySome cultures consider a voluptuous figure to be the ideal female body shape. Having significant amounts of stored fat, without being obese, has for most of human history been a sign in women of health and fertility. A low waist-hip ratio has often been seen as a sign of fertility, but recent research suggests that it is more correlated to body mass index than previously thought.[1] Sexual attractivenessVoluptuous figures have been idealised at many times in history: depictions of fertility goddesses, such as the famous Venus of Willendorf, typically have a voluptuous figure. Marilyn Monroe was a notable example of a woman with a voluptuous body shape who was considered to be a sex symbol, (however, it should be noted that the dress she wore to sing happy birthday to JFK in 1962 was a current US size 5). More recently, Tyra Banks is considerably more zaftig and busty when compared to a modern supermodel. A voluptuous body shape is also more commonly seen in glamour models than in fashion models, perhaps more accurately expressing typical male sexual preferences than the thin female body shape promoted in the mass media. Indeed, there are whole categories of pornography that exclusively depict women of one particular body shape. Feminism and body shapeFeminists decry the excessive emphasis on body shape as part of women's self-image in Western society, and contend that a voluptuous body shape is more typical of real women in the West than the anorexic ideal pushed by the Western media through depictions of extremely thin actresses and fashion models. Anorexia and media depictions of thinness in womenSociocultural studies highlight the role of cultural factors in the incidence of anorexia nervosa in women, such as the promotion of thinness as the ideal female form in Western industrialised nations, particularly through the media. A recent epidemiological study of 989,871 Swedish residents indicated that gender, ethnicity and socio-economic status were highly correlated with the chance of developing anorexia, and women with non-European parents were among the least likely to diagnosed, while women in wealthy, white families were most at risk.[2] A classic study by Garner and Garfinkel demonstrated that those in professions where there is a particular social pressure to be thin (such as models and dancers) were much more likely to develop anorexia during their career,[3] and further research suggests that those with anorexia have much higher contact with cultural sources that promote weight-loss.[4] Although anorexia nervosa is usually associated with Western cultures, exposure to Western media is thought to have led to an increase in cases in non-Western counties. But other cultures may not display the same worries about becoming fat as those with the condition in the West, but instead may present with low appetite with the other common features.[5] References
See also
|
Sites |
Searched sites for "Female body shape" |
|
No sites found. |
Sorry, no matching site records were found. |
Want your site listed here?
|
||||||||||||||
|
Submit
your site |
|
Relevant quality search results and fast easy navigation throughout the
different sections of the site, make Americola.com |