|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
History
Once when the MOS Technology 6502 (used in the Commodore 64 and Apple II), and later when the Motorola 68000 (used in the Macintosh, Atari ST, and Commodore Amiga) were popular, anybody could use their home computer as a real-time system. The possibility to deactivate other interrupts allowed for hard-coded loops with defined timing, the low interrupt latency allowed the implementation of a real-time operating system, giving the user interface and the disk drives lower priority than the real time thread. Compared to these the programmable interrupt controller of the intel CPUs (8086..80586) generates a very large latency and the windows operating system is neither a real-time operating system nor does it allow a program to take over the CPU completely and use its own scheduler[citation needed]. The Motorola 68000 and subsequent family members (68010, 68020 etc) also became popular with manufacturers of industrial control systems thanks to this facility. This application area is one in which real-time control offers genuine advantages in terms of process performance and safety. Hard and Soft real time systemsA system is said to be real-time if the correctness of an operation depends not only upon the logical correctness of the operation but also upon the time at which it is performed. The classical conception is that in a hard or immediate real-time system, the completion of an operation after its deadline is considered useless - ultimately, this may lead to a critical failure of the complete system. A soft real-time system on the other hand will tolerate such lateness, and may respond with decreased service quality (e.g., dropping frames while displaying a video). Hard real-time systems are typically found interacting at a low level with physical hardware, in embedded systems. For example, a car engine control system is a hard real-time system because a delayed signal may cause engine failure or damage. Other examples of hard real-time embedded systems include medical systems such as heart pacemakers and industrial process controllers.
New overlay scheduling systems, such as an Adaptive Partition Scheduler assist in managing large systems with a mixture of hard real-time and non real-time applications. Soft real-time systems are typically those used where there is some issue of concurrent access and the need to keep a number of connected systems up to date with changing situations. Example: the software that maintains and updates the flight plans for commercial airliners. These can operate to a latency of seconds. It would not be possible to offer modern commercial air travel if these computations could not reliably be performed in real time. Live audio-video systems are also usually soft real-time; violation of constraints results in degraded quality, but the system can continue to operate. It is important to note that hard versus soft real-time does not necessarily relate to the length of time available. A machine may overheat if a processor does not turn on cooling within 15 minutes (hard real-time). On the other hand, a network interface card may lose buffered data if it is not read within a fraction of a second, but the data can be resent over the network if needed, without affecting a critical operation, perhaps without a delay noticeable to the user. Real time and high performanceReal-time computing is sometimes misunderstood to be high performance computing, but this is not always the case. For example, a massive supercomputer running a scientific simulation may offer impressive performance, yet it is not executing a real-time computation. Conversely, once the hardware and software for an anti-lock braking system has been designed to meet its required deadlines, no further performance gains are necessary. Furthermore, if a network server is highly loaded with network traffic, its response time may be slower but will (in most cases) still succeed. Hence, such a network server would not be considered an RTC system: temporal failures (delays, time-outs, etc.) are typically small and compartmentalized but are not catastrophic failures. In an RTC system, a slow-down beyond limits would often be considered catastrophic in its application context. Some kinds of software, such as many chess-playing programs, can fall into either category. For instance, a chess program designed to play in a tournament with a clock will need to decide on a move before a certain deadline or lose the game, and is therefore a real-time computation, but a chess program that is allowed to run indefinitely before moving is not. In both of these cases, however, high performance is desirable: the more work a tournament chess program can do in the allotted time, the better its moves will be, and the faster an unconstrained chess program runs, the sooner it will be able to move. This example also illustrates the essential difference between real-time computations and other computations: if the tournament chess program does not make a decision about its next move in its allotted time it loses the game—i.e., it fails as a real-time computation—while in the other scenario, meeting the deadline is assumed not to be necessary. Design methodsSeveral methods exist to aid the design of real-time systems, an example of which is MASCOT, an old but very successful method which represents the concurrent structure of the system. Other examples are HOOD, Real-Time UML, the Ravenscar profile and Real-Time Java. Key peopleSee also
|
Sites |
Searched sites for "Real-time computing" |
|
No sites found. |
Sorry, no matching site records were found. |
Want your site listed here?
|
||||||||||||||
|
Submit
your site |
|
Relevant quality search results and fast easy navigation throughout the
different sections of the site, make Americola.com |