|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
NomenclatureImage:15in howitzer Menin Rd 5 October 1917.jpg 15-inch howitzer of the Royal Marine Artillery The English word howitzer comes from the Dutch word houwitser which, in turn, was derived from the Czech word houfnice, which, having an original meaning of "catapult", was used during the Hussite Wars of the fifteenth century to refer to a particular type of artillery piece. [1] The words for "howitzer" in a number of other languages, such as the German Haubitze or the Swedish haubits, share the same root.
The British had a further method of nomenclature that they adopted in the 19th Century. Guns were categorised by projectile weight in pounds while howitzers were categorised by calibre in inches. This system broke down in the 1930s with the introduction of gun-howitzers. In 1939 they started dropping the words "Gun" and "Howitzer" from their artillery nomenclature. HistoryImage:Howitzer firing.jpg US M198 gun-howitzer The first modern howitzers were invented in the Netherlands towards the end of the seventeenth century. These were characterised by a shorter trail than other field guns that meant:
Originally intended for use in siege warfare, they were particularly useful for delivering cast-iron shells filled with gunpowder or incendiary materials into the interior of fortifications. In contrast to contemporary mortars, which were fired at a fixed angle and were entirely dependent upon adjustments to the size of propellant charges in order to vary range, howitzers could be fired at a wide variety of angles. Thus, while howitzer gunnery was more complicated than the technique of employing mortars, the howitzer was an inherently more flexible weapon that could fire its projectiles along a wide variety of trajectories.[2]
Image:Canon 155mm TRF1 fh000024.jpg French TRF1 155 mm gun-howitzer In the mid-nineteenth century, some armies attempted to simplify their artillery parks by introducing smoothbore artillery pieces that were designed to fire both explosive projectiles and cannonballs, thereby replacing both field howitzers and field guns. The most famous of these "gun-howitzers" was the Napoleon 12-pounder, a weapon of French design that saw extensive service in the American Civil War.[4] In 1859, the armies of Europe (to include those which had recently adopted gun-howitzers) began to rearm their field batteries with rifled field guns. These new field pieces used cylindrical projectiles that, while smaller in calibre than the spherical shells of smoothbore field howitzers, could carry a comparable charge of gunpowder. Moreover, their greater range combined allowed them to create many of the same effects (such as firing over low walls) that had previously required the sharply curved trajectories of smoothbore field howitzers. Because of this, military authorities saw no point in obtaining rifled field howitzers to replace their smoothbore counterparts but, instead, used rifled field guns to replace both guns and howitzers.[5] In siege warfare, the introduction of rifling had the opposite effect. In the 1860s, artillery officers discovered that rifled siege howitzers (which were substantially larger than field howitzers) were a much more efficient means of destroying walls (and particularly walls that were protected by intervening obstacles of certain kinds) than either siege guns or siege mortars. Thus, at the same time that armies were taking howitzers of one sort out of their field batteries, they were introducing howitzers of another sort into their siege trains and fortresses. The lightest of these weapons (which would later become known as "light siege howitzers") had calibers in the vicinity of 150mm or so and fired shells that weighed between 40 and 50 kilograms. The heaviest (which would later be called "medium siege howitzers") had calibers between 200mm and 220mm and fired shells that weighed about 100 kilograms. [6] Image:M109BREECH.JPG Breech of a US M109 gun-howitzer During the 1880s, a third type of siege howitzer was added to inventories of a number of European armies. With calibers that ranged between 240mm and 270mm and shells that weighed more than 150 kilos, these soon came to be known as "heavy siege howitzers." A good example of a weapon of this class is provided by the 9.45-inch (240mm) weapon that the British Army purchased from the Skoda works in 1899. (Intended for use against the fortifications of Pretoria,which fell before they could be used, and subsequently deployed to China for use against the fortifications of Peking, which also fell without a siege, the 9.45-inch howitzer was never fired in anger.) In the early twentieth century, the introduction of howitzers that were significantly larger than the heavy siege howitzers of the day made necessary the creation of a fourth category, that of "super-heavy siege howitzers". Weapons of this category include the famous Big Bertha of the German Army and the 15-inch (381mm) howitzer of the Royal Marine Artillery. These large howitzers were made possible by mechanical traction instead of horse teams, of course they were transported as several loads and had to be assembled on their firing position. In the Russo-Turkish War of 1877-1878, the inability of rifled field guns to inflict significant damage upon field fortifications led to a revival of interest in field howitzers. By the 1890s, a number of European armies fielded either light (105mm to 127mm) or heavy (149mm to 155mm) field howitzers and a few, such as that of Germany, fielded both. These field howitzers introduced at the end of the nineteenth century were valued for their ability to fire shells with high trajectories giving a steep angle of descent and, as a result, could strike targets that were protected by intervening obstacles. Howitzers of this era were also valued for their ability to fire shells that were about twice as large as shells fired by guns of the same size. Thus, while a 75mm field gun that weighed one ton or so was limited to shells that weighed less than 8 kilograms, a 105mm howitzer of the same weight could easily fire shells that weighed 15 or 16 kilograms. This is a matter of fundamental mechanics affecting the stability and hence the weight of the carriage. However, despite having a greater maximum elevation, the price was that howitzers had a shorter maximum range than the equivalent gun. As heavy field howitzers and light siege howitzers of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries used ammunition of the same size and types, there was a marked tendency for the two types to merge. At first, this was largely a matter of the same basic weapon being employed on two different mountings. Later, as on-carriage recoil-absorbing systems eliminated many of the advantages that siege platforms had enjoyed over field carriages, the same combination of barrel assembly, recoil mechanism and carriage was used in both roles. By the early 20th Century the differences between gun and howitzers were generally recognised[7] as follows:
The onset of trench warfare after the first few months of First World War greatly increased the demand for howitzers that gave a steep angle of descent, which were better suited than guns to the task of striking targets on a horizontal plane (such as trenches) with large amounts of explosive and considerably less barrel wear. The army that reaped the greatest benefit from this phenomenon was that of Germany, which began the war with a far greater proportion of howitzers than the French.[8] Howitzers introduced in the course of World War I often had longer barrels than comparable weapons that had been introduced before 1914. Thus, while the standard German light field howitzer at the start of the war (the 10,5 cm leichte Feldhaubitze 98/09) had a barrel that was 16 calibers long, the light field howitzer adopted by the German Army in 1916 (10,5 cm leichte Feldhaubitze 16) had a barrel that was 22 calibers long. At the same time, new models of field gun introduced during that conflict, such as the 77mm field gun adopted by the German Army in 1916 (7,7 cm Feldkanone 16) were often provided with carriages that allowed firing at comparatively high angles and adjustable propellant cartridges. [9]In other words, there was a marked tendency for howitzers to become more "gun-like" while guns were taking on some of the attributes of howitzers. Image:4-14 Marines in Fallujah.jpg Nine men gun crew firing a US M198 howitzer In the years after World War I, the tendency of guns and howitzers to acquire each others characteristics led to the renaissance of the concept of the gun-howitzer. This was a product of technical advances such as the French invention of autofrettage just before World War 1, which led to stronger and lighter barrels, the use of cut-off gear to control recoil length depending on firing elevation angle, and the invention of muzzlebrakes to reduce recoil forces. Like the gun-howitzers of the nineteenth century, those of the twentieth century replaced both guns and howitzers. Thus, the 25-pounder "gun-howitzer" of the British Army replaced both the 18-pounder field gun and the 4.5-inch howitzer. While this had the effect of simplifying such things as organization, training and the supply of ammunition, it created considerable confusion in the realm of nomenclature. That is, as the term "gun-howitzer" was inherently awkward, most soldiers referred to weapons of that class as either "guns" or "howitzers". Officially the British solved the problem by omitting both terms from the official designations, opting instead to name equipment by using the combination of its ordnance and carriage titles, then (after a suitable lapse of time) calling the 25 pounder replacement a "gun". Unofficially they were always called "guns" except by a few pedants who insisted on "gun-howitzer". In the US Army, however, the preferred term was "howitzer". What is true for English, moreover, is also true for many other European languages. Thus, as gun-howitzers replaced both guns and howitzers, words such as "obusier" (French) and "haubitze" (German), which had originally been used to designate weapons with relatively short barrels, were applied to weapons with much longer barrels. Since World War II, most of the artillery pieces adopted by land armies for use as surface-to-surface weapons have been gun-howitzers. TypesA self-propelled howitzer is mounted on a tracked or wheeled motor vehicle. In many cases, it is protected by some sort of armor. A pack howitzer is a relatively light howitzer that is designed to be easily broken down into several pieces, each of which is small enough to be carried by a mule or a packhorse. A mountain howitzer is a relatively light howitzer designed for use in mountainous terrain. Most, but not all, mountain howitzers are also pack howitzers. A siege howitzer is a howitzer that is designed to be fired from a mounting on fixed platform of some sort. A field howitzer is a howitzer that is mobile enough to accompany a field army on campaign. It is invariably provided with a wheeled carriage of some sort. Examples
Notes
See alsoes:Obús fr:Obusier ko:곡사포 id:Howitzer it:Obice he:הוביצר lt:Haubica nl:Houwitser ja:榴弾砲 no:Haubits pl:Haubica pt:Obus ru:Гаубица sl:Havbica fi:Haupitsi sv:Haubits vi:Lựu pháo zh:榴弹炮
|
Sites |
Searched sites for "Howitzer" |
|
No sites found. |
Sorry, no matching site records were found. |
Want your site listed here?
|
||||||||||||||
|
Submit
your site |
|
Relevant quality search results and fast easy navigation throughout the
different sections of the site, make Americola.com |