Child support

Family law
Entering into marriage
Prenuptial agreement  · Marriage
Common-law marriage
Same-sex marriage
Legal states similar to marriage
Cohabitation  · Civil union
Domestic partnership
Registered partnership
Dissolution of marriage
Annulment  · Divorce  · Alimony
Issues affecting children
Paternity  · Legitimacy  · Adoption
Legal guardian  · Ward
Emancipation of minors
Parental responsibility
Contact (including Visitation)
Residence in English law
Custody  · Child support
Areas of possible legal concern
Spousal abuse  · Child abuse
Child abduction
Adultery  · Bigamy  · Incest
Conflict of Laws Issues
Marriage  · Nullity  · Divorce

In many countries, child support or child maintenance is the ongoing obligation for a periodic payment made by a non-custodial parent to a custodial parent, caregiver or guardian, for the care and support of children of a relationship or marriage that has been terminated. In family law, child support is often arranged as part of a divorce, marital separation, dissolution, annulment, determination of parentage or dissolution of a civil union and may supplement alimony (spousal support) arrangements.

Legal theory

Child support is based on the policy that parents are obligated to pay for the support of their children, even when the children are not living with both biological parents. Though courts typically permit visitation rights to non-custodial parents, in such separations one parent is often awarded custody and the role of primary caregiver. In such cases, the other parent still remains obligated to pay a proportion of the costs involved in raising the child. Child support may also be ordered to be paid by one parent to another when both parents are custodial parents and they share the child raising responsibilities. In rare cases, a parent with sole custody of his or her children may be ordered to pay child support to the noncustodial parent to support the children while they are in the care of that parent.

These costs are still legally obligatory, even when the paying parent has been legally limited or prevented by the other parent from participating in or making decisions involving the upbringing of the child or children. It is also important to note the custodial parent is expected to pay a percentage of the costs incurred raising a child, even if a non-custodial parent has been ordered to make child support payments. In Massachusetts, for example [1], it is the responsibility of the custodial parent alone to pay the first $100 in all uninsured medical costs for each child, per year. Only then will the courts consider authorizing child-support money from a non-custodial parent to be used for said costs.

In most jurisdictions there is no need for the parents to be married, and only paternity and/or maternity (filiation) need to be demonstrated for a child support obligation to be found by a competent court. Child support may also operate through the principle of estoppel where a de facto parent that is in loco parentis for a sufficient time to establish a permanent parental relationship with the child or children. In many states the principle of estoppel can be used to require a person to pay child support even if the assumption of a parental relationship was the result of a fraudulent misrepresentation of paternity by the mother. (See Paternity fraud).

Different jurisdictions

In very few jurisdictions the privilege of visitation (or access) is tied to child support. If the custodial parent refuses to allow the non-custodial parent visitation with the child, the non-custodial parent can petition the court to temporarily stop support payments. In most jurisdictions the two rights and obligations are completely separate and individually enforceable as some jurisdictions view the withholding of support as punishing the child, not the parent, and in such cases the court may order additional visitation to the non-custodial parent. Visitation is a limited form of custody.

Child support laws vary around the world. Some jurisdictions sort the arrangements out directly between the parents. Others involve the state collecting child support payments as though it were a tax. In the United States some non-custodial parents claim there is no accountability on the part of the custodial parent regarding how child support payments are spent and accuse the custodial parent of spending support money on non-child related expenses. Depending on the jurisdiction, a custodial parent might legally be required to account for how child support money is spent. In the United States, 10 states (Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Indiana, Louisiana, Missouri, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Oregon, and Washington) allow courts to demand an accounting from custodial parent on how child support dollars are spent. Additionally, Alabama courts have authorized such accounting under certain specific circumstances. Despite this, some non-custodial parents in such situations still view their only recourse lies in petitioning the court for a change of custody.

Courts have held that it is acceptable for child support payments to be used to indirectly benefit the custodial parent. For example, child support monies may be used to heat the child's residence, even if this means that other people also benefit from living in a heated home.

Determining Child Support

There are two approaches to calculating legal child support award amounts. One, based on the costs of supporting a child, the other related to the capacity of parents to contribute to the support. In the United States, the federal government requires all states to have guideline calculations that can be verified and certified. These are usually computer programs based upon certain financial information including, earnings, visitation, taxes, insurance costs, and several other factors.

In most states existing child support orders are reviewed once every three years to see if modifications or adjustments in payment amounts are necessary. Child support modifications can also be requested at any time by either the custodial or the non-custodial parent. If a non-custodial parent loses his or her job or experiences financial hardship, he or she can request to have the amount of the child support payments reduced. Conversely, if the non-custodial parent's salary or income increases, or if the child's personal expenses increase, the custodial parent can request modifications to increase the child support payments. Modifications are performed and executed depending on the lifestyle of either parent.

Obtaining Child Support

Child support is paid by the noncustodial parent to ensure that their children have what they need to live a comfortable life. Child support laws and enforcement differ from state to state, but in all regions and jurisdictions, non-custodial parents must pay according to the court's child support order or face legal consequences.

Some parents also have informal or voluntary agreements or arrangements that do not involve the courts, where financial child support or other noncash support is provided by non-custodial parents to assist in supporting their child(ren).

In divorce cases, child support payments may be determined as part of the divorce settlement, along with other issues, such as alimony, custody and visitation. In other cases, there are several steps that must be undertaken to receive court-ordered child support. Some custodial parents may hire lawyers to oversee their child support cases for them; others may file their own applications in their local courthouses.

The custodial parent, or his or her attorney, must file an application to have the child support case heard by the court. The applications vary from state to state, but generally collect identifying information about both the custodial and non-custodial parents, including their names, social security numbers and dates of birth. Court fees vary from state to state, but can cost up to $25 USD. If the custodial parent is receiving any type of assistance from the state or federal government, the application fees may be waived.

Before the case can proceed, the non-custodial parent must be physically located. If the non-custodial parent's social security number is known, he or she may be located through employment, banking or tax records. Other non-custodial parents are found through information provided by family or friends. Private investigators and "people finder" databases can also be used to locate non-custodial parents.

Once the non-custodial parent is located, he or she will be visited by a local sheriff, police officer or process server and served with a court summons. The summons informs the non-custodial parent that she or he is being sued for child support. Once served, the non-custodial parent must attend a mandatory court hearing to determine if he or she is responsible for child support payments.

If a non-custodial parent denies fathering the child, or if he is not listed on the child's birth certificate, the court will order a paternity test to establish paternity before proceeding with the child support hearing. Once the identity of the father is confirmed through DNA testing, the child's birth certificate may be amended to include the father's name. The father may also acknowledge paternity by signing a statutory declaration of acknowledgment form.

After the responsibility for child support is established and questions of paternity have been answered to the court's satisfaction, the court will order the non-custodial parent to make timely child support payments.

In addition to monetary payments, non-custodial parents may be ordered to add their children to their health insurance plans. In some states both parents are responsible for providing medical insurance for the child/children. If both parents possess health coverage, the child may be added to the more beneficial plan, or use one to supplement the other. If a non-custodial parent is ordered to pay health benefits for the child/children, it will automatically be garnished for their wages. Non-custodial parents in the armed forces may also be requested to apply for dependents' cards for military benefits and health coverage for their children.

Many American universities also consider non-custodial parents to be partially responsible for paying college costs, and will consider their income in their financial aid determinations. In certain states, non-custodial parents may be ordered by the court to assist with these expenses. [2]

The age at which child support payments end differs by court order and by state. In some jurisdictions, payments may cease when the child turns 18 or graduates from high school, whichever happens last. In other states, or under other court orders, non-custodial parents may be responsible for payments until the age of 19 or 21. If a child seeks legal emancipation support may also be terminated. If the non-custodial parent owes back child support, he or she must continue to make payments until the debt is satisfied, regardless of the age of the child.

United States

Main article: Child support in the United States

Child support enforcement in the United States at the Federal level is the responsibility of the Administration for Children and Families in the Department of Health and Human Services, there is an over-arching framework of federal legislation (title IV-D of the Social Security Act) and regulation within which the states must operate if they wish to receive federal funding. States may also receive additional financial "incentive" payments for establishing paternity, or establishing or modifying child support orders. Although the federal child support program in the United States traces its origins to a congressional concern for recouping from absent parents some of the cash assistance paid to custodial parents, total U.S. child support collections in 2005 totaled $23 billion, most of which was paid to families not on public assistance.

Each state is responsible for developing a child support enforcement program that complies with federal requirements, including a guidelines method of calculating child support. Most states have their own "Child Support Guidelines Worksheet" used by local courts and state Child Support Enforcement Offices to determine a "standard calculation" of child support. Courts may deviate from this standard calculation in particular cases.

The Uniform Interstate Family Support Act addresses the interaction of varying State legislation and regulations to ensure that only one state has the power to impose or modify child support at any one time, providing:

• Reciprocal recognition of orders between states
• Enforcement of child support across state lines
• Conflict of laws and orders awarded by different states.

Particular issues of conflict are further discussed in the Child support in the United States article regarding conflict of laws for the states of California, Connecticut, the District of Columbia and Maryland.

Major Federal Child Support Enforcement Laws

1975 - Social Security Act, Title IV, Section D
1984 - Child Support Amendments
1988 - Family Support Act
1992 - Child Support Recovery Act
1993 - Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act
1994 - Full Faith and Credit Act
1996 - Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunities Reconciliation Act
1998 - Dead Beat Parents Punishment Act
2000 - Non-custodial Parent Federal Employee Health Insurace Requirement for Children

Australia

In Australia the Child Support Agency Australia calculates child support based on the income of each parent, a base amount is excluded, and the amount of time the child(ren) spends with each parent. Parents can seek a review where income, assets or other factors lead to the formula not giving a result reflecting the particulars of a case.

United Kingdom

In the UK the Child Support Agency calculates the requisite contribution.

"Dead-beat" parents

Main article: Deadbeat dad

Non-custodial parents who avoid their child support obligations are often termed dead-beat parents. The typical non-custodial parent is the father, thus the common reference to "deadbeat dads". " While "dead-beat" is a descriptive term used often in the media and by child support advocacy groups, it is not the legal term used to describe non-paying parents. Child support agencies typically describe clients as being in compliance, not in compliance or criminally non compliant. Compliance is judged by the paying party's performance in meeting the terms of the legal child support court order.

The US Department of Health and Human Services estimates that 68% of child support cases had arrears owed in 2003 (a figure up from 53% in 1999). Many of these arrearage cases are due to administrative practices such as imputing income to parents where it does not exist and issuing default orders of support. Some non-custodial parents claim their payments are too high. According to one study 38% of Illinois non-custodial parents not paying child-support said they lacked the money to pay. Twenty-three percent used non-payment as a means of protesting a lack of visitation rights. Fourteen percent complained of no accountability over the spending of their child support money, while 13% said they didn't want their child(ren), and 12% denied parentage. Additionally, some non-custodial parents who have been subject to acrimonious divorces often see these payments as unfair and excessive.

In an alarming number of cases, the problem can actually be attributed to the system itself. Specifically, the manner in which the issue of frivilous requests for reviews have been handled has caused many payors to be wrongfully denied timely reviews. There have been some problems with payors frivilously flooding the system with requests in the hope of getting their garnishment lowered but the response to this by many states has been to freeze out any requests for change for 36 months from the time of the last review. What should happen, instead, is that those who file frivious requests should be fined for their offense... that would be far more effective and still allow those who genuinely need a review to get one in a timely manner.

When a payor becomes employed or moves to higher paying work, the review nearly always occurs quickly (as it is often filed by a state agency on the payee's behalf) and the order is adjusten upward. However, when a payor becomes unemployed and needs a review due to the loss of those wages, they are told that they cannot get one without filing special requests to have a review before the 36 month exclusion perod has expired. This requires an atty, whose services the payor cannot possibly afford. In truth, the atty for the state agency handles this for the upward adjustment at no cost to the custodial parent but the non-custodial parent is told to hire an atty.

Worse, some states refuse to abide by the Uniform Guidelines when dealing with a request to transfer jurisdiction for changing an order making it nearly impossible for a payor to actually receive a review once it's been requested. North Carolina is one such state and currently maintains the position that if the order was created in NC but neither parent resides there, then any party wishing to change the order must file their request in the other parent's home state, not their own. This creates undue hardship when the parents live across the country from one another and someone cannot afford to hire legal representation that is 3,000 miles away. The author of this paragraph is in exactly this sort of legal battle and has been unable to get a review for the last 5 years regardless of the fact that income has been slashed in half for that 5 year period. Arrears that have acrued during the time that the author has been denied a review due to jurisdictional bickering are now in excess of $11,000 and, according to estimates, the author has already paid more in child support than would have been required had the reviews kept pace with changes in wages. Instead, the state claims $11,000 in arrears and is still acruing arrears, while denying a review, and the children are 19 and 20 years old. This is only one case among many... and the overall point of this paragraph is that you need to remember that, in addition to true deadbeats, there are many parents who are wrongfully overcharged too. Both are classified as deadbeat, but the truth is that the latter are responsible parents who care, who have paid their rightful obligation (and often more) and who are often treated with disdain even though they've endured financial hardship and ruin as a result of their being denied timely reviews when they are genuinely appropriate.

Remember, just because someone can't pay what the paperwork claims they owe doesn't mean that they're irresponsible, uncaring or a deadbeat. Some are, of course. However, we all know that the system is far from perfect. What the paperwork reflects may not be what it should reflect.

If the non-custodial parent refuses to remit the court-ordered child support payments, the court may take one or several different actions. Non-payment of child support can result in wage or tax refund garnishment, suspension of drivers', professional and recreational licenses, inability to apply for or renew a U.S. passport, and, sometimes, federal prosecution.

Child support and welfare

A major impetus to collection of child support in many places is recovery of welfare expenditure. A resident or custodial parent receiving public assistance, as in the US Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), is required to assign his or her right to child support to the Department of Welfare before cash assistance is received. Another common requirement of welfare benefits in some jurisdictions is that the custodial parent must pursue child support from the non-custodial parent.

Court services

Some opponents of child support claim that requiring non-custodial parents to pay child-support creates jobs to sustain the divorce industry. They point out that in the US family court judges earn $90,000 to $160,000 per year (cf. p. 1 table) and each judge requires a staff. One association claims the industry consists of "60,000 professionals includes line/managerial/executive child support staff; state and local agencies; judges; court masters; hearing officers; government and private attorneys; social workers; advocates; corporations that "partner" with government to provide child support services and private collection agencies." An industry of 60,000 professionals would comprise less than one-twentieth of a percent of the United State's 147.3 million-person workforce.

In the United States, state courts typically maintain a child support division - essentially an accounting department recording amounts owed and paid. Some maintain that because the county clerks responsible for record keeping are not certified accountants, inaccuracies concerning child support payments are common. Some people also claim that outside auditors do not monitor the accuracy of child support reports. In many counties, like Illinois’ Cook and Kane counties, the division audits themselves. However other jurisdictions adopt different methods - for example, in 2003 independent auditors reviewed and audited the Child Support Enforcement Agency of Hawaii. The state of Texas has also conducted such an independent audit. The Clark County, Nevada district attorney's office has also been independently audited (in 2003) regarding child support payment collections. And also in 2003, the state of Maryland recommended outside audits on its five metro child support enforcement operations.

See also

• Alimony
• Brian Stewart
• Contact centre
• Child abduction
• Child custody
• Child Support Agency (UK)
• Child Support Agency Australia
• Divorce
• Family law
• Fathers' rights
• Joint custody
• List of men's rights organizations
• Men's rights
• Parenting plan
• Parental Alienation Syndrome
• Paternity
• Shared residency in English law
• Shared parenting

References

• Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) 42 U.S.Code §602a(1)& (2)
• Child Support Agency Australia, 2006 Child Support Schemes: Australia and Comparisons 2006 [3]

Wikipedia information about Child support This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Child support". It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer). Help contribute to Americola and edit this article.