|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Pi as IrrationalAryabhata worked on the approximation for Pi, and may have realized that <math>\pi</math> is irrational. In the second part of the Aryabhatiyam. In other words, <math>\pi \approx 62832/20000 = 3.1416</math>, correct to five digits. The commentator Nilakantha Somayaji, (Kerala School, 15th c.) has argued that the word āsanna (approaching), appearing just before the last word, here means not only that this is an approximation, but that the value is incommensurable (or irrational). If this is correct, it is quite a sophisticated insight, for the irrationality of pi was proved in Europe only in 1761 (Lambert). Aryabhata greatest contribution is signified by 0 (Zero). Notation for placeholders in positional numbers is found on stone tablets from ancient (3,000 B.C.) Sumeria. Yet, the Greeks had no concept of a number like zero. In terms of modern use, zero is sometimes traced to the Indian mathematician Aryabhata who, about 520 A.D., devised a positional decimal number system that contained a word, "kha," for the idea of a placeholder. By 876, based on an existing tablet inscription with that date, the kha had become the symbol "0". Meanwhile, somewhat after Aryabhata, another Indian, Brahmagupta, developed the concept of the zero as an actual independent number, not just a place-holder, and wrote rules for adding and subtracting zero from other numbers. The Indian writings were passed on to al-Khwarizmi (from whose name we derive the term algorithm) and thence to Leonardo Fibonacci and others who continued to develop the concept and the number. Mensuration and TrigonometryIn Ganitapada 6, Aryabhata gives the area of triangle as
But he gave an incorrect rule for the volume of a pyramid.[3] Aryabhata was not concerned with demonstrating his formulas.[4] Aryabhata, in his work Aryabhata-Siddhanta, first defined the sine as the modern relationship between half an angle and half a chord. He also defined the cosine, versine, and inverse sine. He used the words jya for sine, kojya for cosine, ukramajya for versine, and otkram jya for inverse sine.
So we see that sin(15) (sum of first four terms) = 890/3438 = 0.258871 (correct value = 0.258819, correct to four significant digits). The value of sin(30) (corresponding to hasjha) is 1719/3438 = 0.5; this is of course, exact. His alphabetic code (there are many such codes in Sanskrit) has come to be known as the Aryabhata cipher. Motions of the Solar SystemAryabhata described a geocentric model of the solar system, in which the Sun and Moon are each carried by epicycles which in turn revolve around the Earth. In this model, which is also found in the Paitāmahasiddhānta (ca. AD 425), the motions of the planets are each governed by two epicycles, a smaller manda (slow) epicycle and a larger śīghra (fast) epicycle.[5] The positions and periods of the planets were calculated relative to uniformly moving points, which in the case of Mercury and Venus, move around the Earth at the same speed as the mean Sun and in the case of Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn move around the Earth at specific speeds representing each planet's motion through the zodiac. Most historians of astronomy consider that this two epicycle model reflects elements of pre-Ptolemaic Greek astronomy. Another element in Aryabhata's model, the śīghrocca, the basic planetary period in relation to the Sun, is seen by some historians as a sign of an underlying heliocentric model. Aryabhata defines the sizes of the planets' orbits in terms of these periods.[6][7] He states that the Moon and planets shine by reflected sunlight. He also correctly explains eclipses of the Sun and the Moon, and presents methods for their calculation and prediction. In the fourth book of his Aryabhatiya, Goladhyaya or Golapada, Aryabhata is dealing with the celestial sphere, shape of the earth, cause of day and night etc. In golapAda.6 he says:
Another statement, referring to Lanka , describes the movement of the stars as a relative motion caused by the rotation of the earth:
However, in the next verse he describes the motion of the stars and planets as real: “The cause of their rising and setting is due to the fact the circle of the asterisms together with the planets driven by the provector wind, constantly moves westwards at Lanka”. Lanka here is a reference point to mean the equator, which was known to pass through Sri Lanka. Aryabhata's computation of Earth's circumference as 24,835 miles, which was only 0.2% smaller than the actual value of 24,902 miles. This approximation improved on the computation by the Alexandrinan mathematician Erastosthenes (c.200 BC), whose exact computation is not known in modern units. The Oldest Accurate Astronomical ConstantIn the work The Àryabhatiya of Àryabhata, An Ancient Indian Work on Mathematics and Astronomy, translated by William Eugene Clark, Professor of Sanskrit at Harvard University (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois. 1930), Àryabhata writes that 1,582,237,500 rotations of the Earth equal 57,753,336 lunar orbits. This extremely accurate ratio for two fundamental cosmic motions was noticed in the 1990s and published online in 'The Àryabhatiya of Àryabhata: The oldest exact astronomical constant?' in 1998 by James Q. Jacobs. Jacobs determined that the ratio was precise for about 1600 BCE, and that it represents the earliest written astronomic ratio of such accuracy. Considered in modern English units of time, Aryabhata calculated the sidereal rotation (the rotation of the earth referenced the fixed stars) as 23 hours 56 minutes and 4.1 seconds; the modern value is 23:56:4.091. Similarly, his value for the length of the sidereal year at 365 days 6 hours 12 minutes 30 seconds is an error of 3 minutes 20 seconds over the length of a year. The notion of sidereal time was known in most other astronomical systems of the time, but this computation was likely the most accurate in the period. HeliocentrismAryabhata's computations are consistent with a heliocentric motion of the planets orbiting the sun and the earth spinning on its own axis. While he is not the first to say this, his authority was certainly most influential. The earlier Indian astronomical texts Shatapatha Brahmana (c. 9th-7th century BC), Aitareya Brahmana (c. 9th-7th century BC) and Vishnu Purana (c. 1st century BC) contain early concepts of a heliocentric model.[citation needed] Heraclides of Pontus (4th c. BC) is sometimes credited with a heliocentric theory. Aristarchus of Samos (3rd century BC) is usually credited with knowing of the heliocentric theory. The version of Greek astronomy known in ancient India, Paulisa Siddhanta (possibly by a Paul of Alexandria) makes no reference to a Heliocentric theory. The 8th century Arabic edition of the Āryabhatīya was translated into Latin in the 13th century, well before Copernicus and may have influenced European astronomy, though a direct connection with Copernicus cannot be established. Diophantine EquationsA problem of great interest to Indian mathematicians since very ancient times concerned diophantine equations. These involve integer solutions to equations such as ax + b = cy. Here is an example from Bhaskara's commentary on Aryabhatiya: :
i.e. find N = 8x+5 = 9y+4 = 7z+1. It turns out that the smallest value for N is 85. In general, diophantine equations can be notoriously difficult. Such equations were considered extensively in the ancient Vedic text Sulba Sutras, the more ancient parts of which may date back to 800 BCE. Aryabhata's method of solving such problems, called the kuttaka method. Kuttaka means pulverizing, that is breaking into small pieces, and the method involved a recursive algorithm for writing the original factors in terms of smaller numbers. Today this algorithm, as elaborated by Bhaskara in AD 621, is the standard method for solving first order Diophantine equations, and it is often referred to as the Aryabhata algorithm. See details of the Kuttaka method in this [1]. Continued RelevanceAryabhata's astronomical calculation methods have been in continuous use for the practical purposes of fixing the Panchanga Hindu calendar. Recently Aryabhata was a theme in the RSA Conference 2006, Indocrypt 2005, which had a session on Vedic mathematics. The cryptography community seems to be rediscovering more and more interesting results from ancient Indian mathematics, and its leading luminary, Aryabhata. The lunar crater Aryabhata is named in his honour. Confusion of IdentityThere was confusion regarding Aryabhatta's identity. Another Indian mathematician, Aryabhata II flourished sometime between AD 950 and 1100. Two famous Indian mathematicians named Aryabhata were thought to have lived around AD 500, until, in 1926, B. Datta showed that these two Aryabhattas were one and the same. A precise mention of the year of birth of Aryabhata in the Aryabhatiya (3-10) corresponds to 476. Notes
References
|
Sites |
Searched sites for "Aryabhata" |
|
No sites found. |
Sorry, no matching site records were found. |
Want your site listed here?
|
||||||||||||||
|
Submit
your site |
|
Relevant quality search results and fast easy navigation throughout the
different sections of the site, make Americola.com |