|
SAVE up to 35% on Top Selling Books
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Close-Up
starring: Abolfazl Ahankhah, Mahrokh Ahankhah, Mehrdad Ahankhah, Monoochehr Ahankhah, Haj Ali Reza Ahmadi directed by: Abbas Kiarostami
Average Rating: 
Audience Rating: NR (Not Rated)
Binding: DVD
Fabric Type: 9781565802735
Graphics Memory Size: Color, DVD, NTSC
Legal Disclaimer: 156580273X
Maximum Color Depth: Facets
Maximum Focal Length: FarsiOriginal LanguageEnglishSubtitled
Metal Type: Facets
Pearl Type: FACD62514D
Publisher: 1
Total Firewire Ports: Facets
Total Metal Weight: 1
Total Parallel Ports: March 19, 2002
Total S Video Out Ports: 100 minutes
Facets
1990
Amazonaws.com's Price: $26.99
This item ships for FREE with Super Saver Shipping.
Availability: Usually ships in 1 to 2 days
*Buy from:
UK |
DE |
CAN |
FR |
eBay
[*Item may not be available in all stores.]
|
|

Close-Up starring: Abolfazl Ahankhah, Mahrokh Ahankhah, Mehrdad Ahankhah, Monoochehr Ahankhah, Haj Ali Reza Ahmadi directed by: Abbas Kiarostami
|
Editorial Review:
Product Description: Studio: Facets Multimedia Release Date: 02/19/2002 Run time: 100 minutes
Like other movies by this director, Close-Up moves slowly but somehow develops a quiet momentum that continues after the screen goes dark. I think this is partly due to Kiarostami's sincerity. He feels a genuine interest and affection for his characters, and his movies can give you a powerful sense that yes, their lives are really like that, revealed in repetitions and small struggles.
The New Yorker excerpt quoted above suggests that Close-Up contains a protest against religious authority in Iran. I don't see this as a main theme. There may be some subtle reading on which post revolutionary Iranian society is criticized, but the Islamic judge in the trial appears as a fair minded man and not in the least a zealot. He helps bring about a satisfying resolution. Of all the characters it's the journalist who comes off looking most like a shabby opportunist.
Average Rating: 
Rating: -
Like other movies by this director, Close-Up moves slowly but somehow develops a quiet momentum that continues after the screen goes dark. I think this is partly due to Kiarostami's sincerity. He feels a genuine interest and affection for his characters, and his movies can give you a powerful sense that yes, their lives are really like that, revealed in repetitions and small struggles.
The New Yorker excerpt quoted above suggests that Close-Up contains a protest against religious authority in Iran. I don't see this as a main theme. There may be some subtle reading on which post revolutionary Iranian society is criticized, but the Islamic judge in the trial appears as a fair minded man and not in the least a zealot. He helps bring about a satisfying resolution. Of all the characters it's the journalist who comes off looking most like a shabby opportunist.
Rating: -
This brilliant dramatic re-creation of an unusual case of criminal impersonation examines the conceits of cinema on one hand, but also the state of post-revolutionary Iranian society, where dire poverty and lack of opportunities can crush aspirations, artistic or otherwise. The writer-director, Abbas Kiarostami ("A Taste of Cherry"), read about Sabzian's predicament in a magazine article, decided to film the trial, and then asked everyone involved to play themselves. A fascinating mash-up of reality and artifice, "Close-Up" is a minor miracle of engaged storytelling whose compassionate final minutes will leave an indelible impression.
Rating: -
I've greatly appreciated most of Kiarostami's films as well as other distinguished Iranian filmmakers' works. I recall when I got this film, it was a little late night, and I was already quite sleepy, but I played it anyway. Yes, I must admit that I had a somehow hard time to concentrate on its plot. Perhaps, this film is not a film that you may find out in your local rental stores, neither a film that contains certain predictable film elements that most of majority films do. From the middle of the film, Close-up completely woke me up, and then I couldn't sleep anymore the rest of the night; I watched it once again with full attention.
Close-up moved me deeply and the music hit me; just knocked me down. The subject matter was so strong. Especially, in the ending part, the flower held by the main character came to me as a metaphor of rare hope that sustains our life in which neither such promise nor despair. This is one of the most emotionally powerful films I've ever watched.
Rating: -
The basic story has been summed up by other reviewers, so I won't repeat that now. What I do want to give is a personal account of my experience with this film, that I hope will motivate a few to take a look -- and to be patient. The film doesn't work its magic right away -- and in fact the beginning can be somewhat disorienting.
I'll admit, I'm biased. I've become fascinated by the work of Kiarostami in the past few years. Plus, I am very much drawn to films where reality and fiction intersect and overlap in interesting ways. Still, I'm convinced that with a bit of patience -- if you just give yourself the time to let the film work on you without bringing to it expectations that it won't fulfil -- anyone would be overwhelmed by the marvelous simplicity of this film.
Kiarostami has a way of finding the fantastic in the mundane. Somehow, he sets up his films in such a way that I can find myself for the most part merely interested wondering what it is all about, and then suddenly surprised to find myself overwhelmed, surprised by an emotional response that was not manipulated from me with music but somehow, mysteriously. This happened to me while watching ABC Africa, and even more powerfully during this film. His style, the way he achieves this, can almost be thought of as an anti-style -- I know that may not make a lot of sense, but it would take longer than I have here to make clear what I am thinking when I say this. It seems like he is doing very little, but the effect is (in my experience) magical, unexplainable and overwhelming. (For those familiar with Paul Schrader's exceptional work on transcendental style in Bresson, Ozu and Dreyer, I'd suggest Kiarostami as another who works in this vein -- but whose work is quite distinct from these three).
Rating: -
Elegant, mystifying, sad, beautful, these are just some of the words and feelings which come to mind having watched Close Up. The mixing of genres; is it fact, is it fiction etc. all leave you wondering afterwards, asking yourself what is reality, what is fiction?
That a movie as deceptively simple as this one has the power to stimulate one's mind in such a profound way is a great tribute to the filmaker. It also goes to show that there is a part of our brains, by-passed by almost all contemporary, Western cinema, which is open to simple stories about humble humanity and it's wayard dreams.
If all this sounds a little bit o.t.t., then watch the movie for yourself, allow it wash over you and I guarantee you will get an itch somewhere deep in your head, the part which actually makes you human.
see more
Related Items:
see more
|